This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-13-562T entitled 'U.S. Postal Service: Urgent Action Needed to Achieve Financial Sustainability' which was released on April 17, 2013. This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. United States Government Accountability Office: GAO: Testimony: Before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives: For Release on Delivery: Expected at 9:30 a.m. EDT: Wednesday, April 17, 2013: U.S. Postal Service: Urgent Action Needed to Achieve Financial Sustainability: Statement of Gene L. Dodaro: Comptroller General of the United States: GAO-13-562T: GAO Highlights: Highlights of GAO-13-562T, a testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. Why GAO Did This Study: USPS is in a serious financial crisis as its declining mail volume has not generated sufficient revenue to cover its expenses and financial obligations. First-Class Mail-—which is highly profitable and generates the majority of the revenues used to cover overhead costs—- declined 33 percent since it peaked in fiscal year 2001, and USPS projects a continued decline through fiscal year 2020. Mail volume decline is putting USPS’s mission of providing prompt, reliable, and efficient universal services to the public at risk. This testimony discusses (1) USPS’s financial condition, (2) initiatives to reduce costs and increase revenues, and (3) actions needed to improve USPS’s financial situation. The testimony is based primarily on GAO’s past and ongoing work, its analysis of USPS’s recent financial results, and recent information on USPS’s proposal for a change in delivery service. In previous reports, GAO has provided strategies and options that USPS and Congress could consider to better align USPS costs with revenues and address constraints and legal restrictions that limit USPS’s ability to reduce costs and improve efficiency. GAO has also stated that Congress and USPS need to reach agreement on a comprehensive package of actions to improve USPS’s financial viability. What GAO Found: The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) continues to incur unsustainable operating deficits, has not made required payments of $11.1 billion to prefund retiree health benefits, and has reached its $15 billion borrowing limit. Thus far, USPS has been able to operate within these constraints, but now faces a critical shortage of liquidity that threatens its financial solvency and ability to finance needed capital investment. USPS had an almost 25 percent decline in total mail volume and net losses totaling $40 billion since fiscal year 2006 (see table). While USPS achieved about $15 billion in savings and reduced its workforce by about 168,000 over this period, its debt and unfunded benefit liabilities grew to $96 billion by the end of fiscal year 2012. USPS expects mail volume and revenue to continue decreasing as online bill communication and e-commerce expand. Table: USPS Financial and Operational Information, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2012: Fiscal year: 2006; Net income: $0.9 billion; Annual savings: $0.3 billion; Total mail volume: 213 billion; Career employees: 696,000. Fiscal year: 2007; Net income: ($5.1 billion); Annual savings: $1.2 billion; Total mail volume: 212 billion; Career employees: 685,000. Fiscal year: 2008; Net income: ($2.8 billion); Annual savings: $2.0 billion; Total mail volume: 203 billion; Career employees: 663,000. Fiscal year: 2009; Net income: ($3.8 billion); Annual savings: $6.1 billion; Total mail volume: 177 billion; Career employees: 623,000. Fiscal year: 2010; Net income: ($8.5 billion); Annual savings: $3.0 billion; Total mail volume: 171 billion; Career employees: 584,000. Fiscal year: 2011; Net income: ($5.1 billion); Annual savings: $1.4 billion; Total mail volume: 168 billion; Career employees: 557,000. Fiscal year: 2012; Net income: ($15.9 billion); Annual savings: $1.1 billion; Total mail volume: 160 billion; Career employees: 528,000. Source: USPS. [End of table] USPS has several initiatives to reduce costs and increase its revenues. To reduce costs, USPS announced a 5-year business plan in February 2012 with the goal of achieving $22.5 billion in annual cost savings by the end of fiscal year 2016, which included a proposed change in the delivery schedule. USPS has now put all changes in delivery service on hold, which will reduce its ability to achieve the full 5-year business plan savings. USPS has begun implementing other parts of the plan, which includes needed changes to its network. To achieve greater savings, USPS’s Board of Governors recently directed postal management to accelerate these efforts. To increase revenue, USPS is pursuing 55 initiatives. While USPS expects shipping and package services to continue to grow, such growth is not expected to fully offset declining mail volume. USPS needs to reduce its expenses to avoid even greater financial losses, repay its outstanding debt, continue funding its retirement obligations, and increase capital for investment, including replacing its aging vehicle fleet. Also, Congress needs to act to (1) modify USPS’ s retiree health benefit payments in a fiscally responsible manner; (2) facilitate USPS’s ability to align costs with revenues based on changing workload and mail use; and (3) require that any binding arbitration resulting from collective bargaining takes USPS’s financial condition into account. No one action in itself will address USPS’s financial condition; GAO has previously recommended a comprehensive package of actions. If Congress does not act soon, USPS could be forced to take more drastic actions that could have disruptive, negative effects on its employees, customers, and the availability of postal services. USPS also reported that it may need to prioritize payments to employees and suppliers ahead of those to the federal government. View [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-562T]. For more information, contact Lorelei St. James at (202) 512-2834 or stjamesl@gao.gov. [End of section] Chairman Issa, Ranking Member Cummings, and Members of the Committee: We appreciate the opportunity to be here today to discuss the status of U.S. Postal Service's (USPS) financial condition and actions needed to address USPS's financial challenges. We added USPS's financial condition to our High Risk List in 2009, and USPS continues to face a serious financial crisis as its mail volume declines. USPS has not generated sufficient revenue to cover its expenses and financial obligations. While USPS must continue its efforts to align costs with revenues, congressional action is needed to facilitate necessary changes and help USPS begin to transition to financial sustainability. This testimony discusses (1) USPS's financial condition, (2) USPS's initiatives to reduce costs and increase revenues, and (3) actions needed to improve USPS's financial situation. This testimony is based primarily on our past and ongoing work examining various aspects of USPS's operations and our analysis of USPS's recent financial results, and recent information on USPS's proposal for a change in delivery service that we reviewed from February 2013 to April 2013. This testimony is based on work conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. USPS's Financial Condition: USPS faces a dire financial situation and does not have sufficient revenues to cover its expenses, putting its mission of providing prompt, reliable, and efficient universal services to the public at risk.[Footnote 1] USPS continues to incur operating deficits that are unsustainable, has not made required payments of $11.1 billion to prefund retiree health benefit liabilities,[Footnote 2] and has reached its $15 billion borrowing limit. Moreover, USPS lacks liquidity to maintain its financial solvency or finance needed capital investment. As presented in table 1, since fiscal year 2006, USPS has achieved about $15 billion in savings and reduced its workforce by about 168,000, while also experiencing a 25 percent decline in total mail volume and net losses totaling $40 billion. Table 1: USPS Financial and Operational Information, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2012: Fiscal year: 2006; Net income: $0.9 billion; Annual savings: $0.3 billion; Total mail volume: 213 billion; Career employees: 696,000. Fiscal year: 2007; Net income: ($5.1 billion); Annual savings: $1.2 billion; Total mail volume: 212 billion; Career employees: 685,000. Fiscal year: 2008; Net income: ($2.8 billion); Annual savings: $2.0 billion; Total mail volume: 203 billion; Career employees: 663,000. Fiscal year: 2009; Net income: ($3.8 billion); Annual savings: $6.1 billion; Total mail volume: 177 billion; Career employees: 623,000. Fiscal year: 2010; Net income: ($8.5 billion); Annual savings: $3.0 billion; Total mail volume: 171 billion; Career employees: 584,000. Fiscal year: 2011; Net income: ($5.1 billion); Annual savings: $1.4 billion; Total mail volume: 168 billion; Career employees: 557,000. Fiscal year: 2012; Net income: ($15.9 billion); Annual savings: $1.1 billion; Total mail volume: 160 billion; Career employees: 528,000. Source: USPS. Note: Annual savings are those reported by USPS. [End of table] As a result of significant declines in volume and revenue, USPS reported that it took unprecedented actions to reduce its costs by $6.1 billion in fiscal year 2009. Also in 2009, a cash shortfall necessitated congressional action to reduce USPS's mandated payment to prefund retiree health benefits from $5.4 billion to $1.4 billion.[Footnote 3] In 2011, USPS's $5.5 billion required retiree health benefit payment was delayed until August 1, 2012.[Footnote 4] USPS missed that payment as well as the $5.6 billion that was due by September 30, 2012. USPS continues to face significant decreases in mail volume and revenues as online communication and e-commerce expand. While remaining among USPS's most profitable products, both First-Class Mail and Standard Mail volumes have declined in recent years as illustrated in figure 1. First-Class Mail--which is highly profitable and generates the majority of the revenues used to cover overhead costs-- declined 33 percent since it peaked in fiscal year 2001, and USPS projects a continued decline through fiscal year 2020. Standard Mail (primarily advertising) has declined 23 percent since it peaked in fiscal year 2007, and USPS projects that it will remain roughly flat through fiscal year 2020. Standard Mail is profitable overall, but it takes about three pieces of Standard Mail, on average, to equal the profit from the average piece of First-Class Mail. First-Class Mail and Standard Mail also face competition from electronic alternatives, as many businesses and consumers have moved to electronic payments over the past decade in lieu of using the mail to pay bills. For the first time, in 2010, fewer than 50 percent of all bills were paid by mail. Figure: Actual and Projected First-Class Mail and Standard Mail Volume, Fiscal Years 2000 through 2020: [Refer to PDF for image: multiple line graph] Volume in billions of pieces: Fiscal year: 2000; First-Class Mail: 103.5; Standard Mail: 90.1. Fiscal year: 2001; First-Class Mail: 103.7; Standard Mail: 89.9. Fiscal year: 2002; First-Class Mail: 102.4; Standard Mail: 87.2. Fiscal year: 2003; First-Class Mail: 99.0; Standard Mail: 90.5. Fiscal year: 2004; First-Class Mail: 97.9; Standard Mail: 95.6. Fiscal year: 2005; First-Class Mail: 98.0; Standard Mail: 100.9. Fiscal year: 2006; First-Class Mail: 97.6; Standard Mail: 102.5. Fiscal year: 2007; First-Class Mail: 95.9; Standard Mail: 103.5. Fiscal year: 2008; First-Class Mail: 91.3; Standard Mail: 99.1. Fiscal year: 2009; First-Class Mail: 83.3; Standard Mail: 82.4. Fiscal year: 2010; First-Class Mail: 78.2; Standard Mail: 82.5. Fiscal year: 2011; First-Class Mail: 73.1; Standard Mail: 84.7. Fiscal year: 2012; First-Class Mail: 69.3; Standard Mail: 79.8. Fiscal year: 2013; First-Class Mail: 64.8; Standard Mail: 77.0. Fiscal year: 2014; First-Class Mail: 62.4; Standard Mail: 78.0. Fiscal year: 2015; First-Class Mail: 59.5; Standard Mail: 77.1. Fiscal year: 2016; First-Class Mail: 56.9; Standard Mail: 77.6. Fiscal year: 2017; First-Class Mail: 54.1; Standard Mail: 75.5. Fiscal year: 2018; First-Class Mail: 51.3; Standard Mail: 75.2. Fiscal year: 2019; First-Class Mail: 49.0; Standard Mail: 73.5. Fiscal year: 2020; First-Class Mail: 46.8; Standard Mail: 74.1. Source: USPS. [End of figure] In addition to lost mail volume and revenue, USPS also has incurred financial liabilities, that totaled $96 billion at the end of fiscal year 2012, that included unfunded pension and retiree health benefit liabilities. Table 2 shows the amounts of these liabilities over the last 6 fiscal years. One of these liabilities, USPS's debt to the U.S. Treasury, increased over this period from $4 billion to its statutory limit of $15 billion. Thus, USPS can no longer borrow to maintain its financial solvency or finance needed capital investment. USPS continues to incur unsustainable operating deficits. In this regard, the USPS Board of Governors recently directed postal management to accelerate restructuring efforts to achieve greater savings. Table 9: Selected USPS Liabilities and Unfunded Pension and Health Benefit Liabilities, Fiscal Year End 2007 through 2012: Fiscal Year: 2007; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $4.2 billion; Workers' compensation liabilities: $7.7 billion; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $55.0 billion; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: $3.1 billion; Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($8.4 billion); Total: $61.6 billion. Fiscal Year: 2008; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $7.2; Workers' compensation liabilities: $8.0; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $53.5; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: $3.3; Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($8.8); Total: $63.2. Fiscal Year: 2009; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $10.2 billion; Workers' compensation liabilities: $10.1 billion; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $52.0 billion; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: $9.6 billion; Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($6.8 billion); Total: $75.1 billion. Fiscal Year: 2010; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $12.0 billion; Workers' compensation liabilities: $12.6 billion; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $48.6 billion; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: $7.3 billion; Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($6.9 billion); Total: $73.6 billion. Fiscal Year: 2011; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $13.0 billion; Workers' compensation liabilities: $15.1 billion; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $46.2 billion; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($1.7 billion); Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($11.4 billion); Total: $61.2 billion. Fiscal Year: 2012; Liabilities: Outstanding debt at the end of the fiscal year: $15.0 billion; Workers' compensation liabilities: $17.6 billion; Unfunded retiree health benefit and pension liabilities: Unfunded liabilities for retiree health benefits: $47.8 billion; Unfunded CSRS liabilities (surplus)[A]: $18.7 billion; Unfunded FERS liabilities (surplus)[A]: ($3.0 billion); Total: $96.1 billion. Source: USPS. [A] The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), which became effective on August 1, 1920, established a retirement system for certain federal employees. It was replaced by the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) for federal employees who first entered covered service on and after January 1, 1987. FERS and CSRS projections are sensitive to the economic and demographic assumptions used and have fluctuated from year to year due to actual economic and demographic outcomes (such as investment returns, salary increases, and mortality) being different than those predicted by the assumptions, and to changes in the assumptions themselves. [End of table] These selected USPS liabilities increased from 83 percent of revenues in fiscal year 2007 to 147 percent of revenues in fiscal year 2012 as illustrated in figure 2. This trend demonstrates how USPS liabilities have become a large and growing financial burden. Figure 2: Selected USPS Liabilities and Unfunded Pension and Health Benefit Liabilities as a Percentage of USPS Revenues: [Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph] Fiscal year: 2007; Percentage of total revenue: 83%. Fiscal year: 2008; Percentage of total revenue: 95%. Fiscal year: 2009; Percentage of total revenue: 131%. Fiscal year: 2010; Percentage of total revenue: 90%. Fiscal year: 2011; Percentage of total revenue: 136%. Fiscal year: 2012; Percentage of total revenue: 147%. Source: USPS. [End of figure] USPS's dire financial condition makes paying for these liabilities highly challenging. In addition to reaching its limit in borrowing authority in fiscal year 2012, USPS did not make required prefunding payments of $11.1 billion for fiscal year 2011 and 2012 retiree health benefits. At the end of fiscal year 2012, USPS had $48 billion in unfunded retiree health benefit liabilities. Looking forward, USPS has warned that it suffers from a severe lack of liquidity. As USPS has reported: "Even with some regulatory and legislative changes, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from current and future management actions to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and generate revenue may not be sufficient to meet all of our financial obligations."[Footnote 5] For this reason, USPS has stated that it continues to lack the financial resources to make its annual retiree health benefit prefunding payment. USPS has also reported that in the short term, should circumstances leave it with insufficient liquidity, it may need to prioritize payments to its employees and suppliers ahead of those to the federal government. For example, near the end of fiscal year 2011, in order to maintain its liquidity, USPS temporarily halted its regular contributions for the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) that are supposed to cover the cost of benefits being earned by current employees. However, USPS has since made up those missed FERS payments. USPS's statements about its liquidity raise the issue of whether USPS will need additional financial help to remain solvent while it restructures and, more fundamentally, whether it can remain financially self-sustainable in the long term. USPS has also raised the concern that its ability to negotiate labor contracts is essential to maintaining financial stability and that failure to do so could have significant adverse consequences on its ability to meet its financial obligations. Most USPS employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with four major labor unions which have established salary increases, cost-of-living adjustments, and the share of health insurance premiums paid by employees and USPS. When USPS and its unions are unable to agree, binding arbitration by a third-party panel is used to establish agreement. There is no statutory requirement for USPS's financial condition to be considered in arbitration. In 2010, we reported that the time has come to reexamine USPS's 40-year-old structure for collective bargaining, noting that wages and benefits comprise 80 percent of its costs at a time of escalating losses and a dramatically changed competitive environment.[Footnote 6] We also reported that Congress should consider revising the statutory framework for collective bargaining to ensure that USPS's financial condition be considered in binding arbitration. USPS Initiatives to Reduce Costs and Increase Revenues: USPS has several initiatives to reduce costs and increase its revenues to curtail future net losses. In February 2012, USPS announced a 5- year business plan with the goal of achieving $22.5 billion in annual cost savings by the end of fiscal year 2016. This plan included savings from a change in the delivery schedule; however, USPS has now put all changes in delivery service on hold, which will reduce its ability to achieve the full 5-year business plan savings. USPS has begun implementing other parts of the plan, which includes initiatives to save: * $9 billion in mail processing, retail, and delivery operations, including consolidation of the mail processing network, and restructuring retail and delivery operations; * $5 billion in compensation and benefits and non-personnel initiatives; and: * $8.5 billion through proposed legislative changes, such as eliminating the obligation to prefund USPS's retiree health benefits. - $2.7 billion of this $8.5 billion was estimated savings from moving to a 5-day delivery schedule for all types of mail. - USPS subsequently proposed a modified reduction in its delivery schedule, maintaining package delivery on Saturday, with estimated annual savings of $2 billion, but as noted, USPS has now put even this proposed change in service delivery on hold. Simultaneously, USPS's 5-year plan would further reduce the overall size of the postal workforce by roughly 155,000 career employees, with many of those reductions expected to result from attrition. According to the plan, half of USPS's career employees are currently eligible for full or early retirement. Reducing its workforce is vital because as noted compensation and benefits costs continue to generate about 80 percent of USPS's expenses. Compensation alone (primarily wages) exceeded $36 billion in fiscal year 2012, or close to half of its costs. Compensation costs decreased by $542 million in fiscal year 2012 as USPS offered separation incentives to postmasters and mail handlers to encourage more attrition. This fiscal year, separation incentives were offered to employees represented by the American Postal Workers Union (e.g., mail processing and retail clerks) to encourage further attrition as processing and retail operations are redesigned and consolidated to more closely correspond with workload. Another key area of potential savings included in the 5-year plan focused on reducing compensation and benefit costs. USPS's largest benefit payments in fiscal year 2012 included: * $7.8 billion in current-year health insurance premiums for employees, retirees, and their survivors (USPS's health benefit payments would have been $13.4 billion if USPS had paid the required $5.6 billion retiree health prefunding payment[Footnote 7]); * $3.0 billion in FERS pension funding contributions; * $1.8 billion in social security contributions; * $1.4 billion in workers' compensation payments; and: * $1.0 billion in Thrift Savings Plan contributions. USPS has proposed administering its own health care plan for its employees and retirees and withdrawing from the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) program so that it can better manage its costs and achieve significant savings, which USPS has estimated could be over $7 billion annually. About $5.5 billion of the estimated savings would come from eliminating the retiree health benefit prefunding payment and another $1.5 billion would come from reducing health care costs. We are currently reviewing USPS's proposal including its potential financial effects on participants and USPS. To increase revenue, USPS is working to increase use of shipping and package services. With the continued increase in e-commerce, USPS projects that shipping and package volume will grow by 7 percent in fiscal year 2013, after increasing 7.5 percent in fiscal year 2012. Revenue from these two product categories represented about 18 percent of USPS's fiscal year 2012 operating revenue. However, USPS does not expect that continued growth in shipping and package services will fully offset the continued decline of revenue from First-Class Mail and other products. We recently reported that USPS is pursuing 55 initiatives to generate revenue.[Footnote 8] Forty-eight initiatives are extensions of existing lines of postal products and services, such as offering Post Office Box customers a suite of service enhancements (e.g., expanded lobby hours and earlier pickup times) at selected locations and increasing public awareness of the availability of postal services at retail stores. The other seven initiatives included four involving experimental postal products, such as prepaid postage on the sale of greeting cards, and three that were extensions of nonpostal services that are not directly related to mail delivery.USPS offers 12 nonpostal services including Passport Photo Services, the sale of advertising to support change-of-address processing, and others generating a net income of $141 million in fiscal year 2011.[Footnote 9] Another area of potential revenue generation is USPS's increased use of negotiated service agreements[Footnote 10] that offer competitively priced contracts as well as promotions with temporary rate reductions that are targeted to retain mail volume. We are currently reviewing USPS's use of negotiated service agreements. As USPS attempts to reduce costs and increase revenue, its mission to provide universal service continues. USPS's network serves more than 152 million residential and business delivery points. In May 2011, we reported that many of USPS's delivery vehicles were reaching the end of their expected 24-year operational life and that USPS's financial challenges pose a significant barrier to replacing or refurbishing its fleet.[Footnote 11] As a result, USPS's approach has been to maintain the delivery fleet until USPS determines how to address longer term needs, but USPS has been increasingly incurring costs for unscheduled maintenance because of breakdowns. The eventual replacement of its vehicle delivery fleet represents yet another financial challenge facing USPS. We are currently reviewing USPS's investments in capital assets. Actions Needed to Improve USPS's Financial Situation: We have issued a number of reports on strategies and options for USPS to improve its financial situation by optimizing its network and restructuring the funding of its pension and retiree health benefit liabilities. Network Optimization: To assist Congress in addressing issues related to reducing USPS's expenses, we have issued several reports analyzing USPS's initiatives to optimize its mail processing, delivery, and retail networks. Mail Processing: In April 2012, we issued a report related to USPS's excess capacity in its network of 461 mail processing facilities.[Footnote 12] We found that USPS's mail processing network exceeds what is needed for declining mail volume. USPS proposed consolidating its mail processing network, a plan based on proposed changes to overnight delivery service standards for First-Class Mail and Periodicals. Such a change would have enabled USPS to reduce an excess of 35,000 positions and 3,000 pieces of mail equipment, among other things. We found, however, that stakeholder issues and other challenges could prevent USPS from implementing its plan for consolidating its mail processing network. Although some business mailers and Members of Congress expressed support for consolidating mail processing facilities, other mailers, Members of Congress, affected communities, and employee organizations raised concerns. Key issues raised by business mailers were that closing facilities could increase their transportation costs and decrease service. Employee associations were concerned that reducing service could result in a greater loss of mail volume and revenue that could worsen USPS's financial condition. We reported that if Congress preferred to retain the current delivery service standards and associated network, decisions will need to be made about how USPS's costs for providing these services will be paid. Delivery: Over the past several years, USPS has proposed transitioning to a new delivery schedule. Most recently, in February of this year, USPS proposed limiting its delivery of mail on Saturdays to packages--a growing area for USPS--and to Express Mail, Priority Mail, and mail addressed to Post Office Boxes.[Footnote 13] Preserving Saturday delivery for packages would address concerns previously raised by some stakeholders, such as delivery of needed medications. USPS estimated that this reduced Saturday delivery would produce $2 billion in annual savings after full implementation, which would take about two years to achieve, and result in a mail volume decline of less than one percent. Based on our 2011 work,[Footnote 14] and recent information from USPS on their February 2013 estimate, we note that the previous and current estimates are primarily based on eliminating city and rural carrier work hours on Saturdays. In our prior work, stakeholders raised a variety of concerns about these estimates, several of which are still relevant. For example, USPS's estimate assumed that most of the Saturday workload transferred to weekdays would be absorbed through more efficient delivery. USPS estimated that its current excess capacity should allow it to absorb the Saturday workload on Monday. If that is not the case, some of the projected savings may not be realized. Another concern stakeholders raised was that USPS may have underestimated the size of the potential volume loss from eliminating Saturday delivery due to the methodology used to develop its estimates. Since mail volume has declined from the prior estimate, the accuracy of the estimated additional impact of eliminating Saturday delivery is unclear. The extent to which USPS would be able to achieve its most recent estimate of $2 billion in annual savings depends on how well and how quickly it can realign its workforce and delivery operations. Nevertheless, we agree that such a change in USPS's delivery schedule would likely result in substantial savings.[Footnote 15] A change to 5-day service would be similar to changes USPS has made in the past. USPS is required by law to provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services, as nearly as practicable. The Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) has reported that delivery frequency is a key element of universal postal service. The Postal Service's universal service obligation is broadly outlined in multiple statutes and encompasses multiple dimensions including delivery frequency. Other key dimensions include geographic scope, range of products, access to services and facilities, affordable and uniform pricing, service quality, and security of the mail.[Footnote 16] The frequency of USPS mail delivery has evolved over time to account for changes in communication, technology, transportation, and postal finances. The change to 5-day service would be a similar change. Until 1950, residential deliveries were made twice a day in most cities. Currently, while most customers receive 6-day delivery, some customers receive 5-day or even 3-day-a- week delivery, including businesses that are not open 6 days a week; resort or seasonal areas not open year-round; and areas not easily accessible, some of which require the use of boats, airplanes, or trucks. Following USPS's most recent proposed change in delivery in February 2013, we issued a legal opinion concerning the proposal in response to a congressional request. As requested, we addressed whether a requirement contained in the USPS's annual appropriations acts for the past three decades and contained in its fiscal year 2012 appropriations act[Footnote 17]--that it continue 6-day delivery of mail "at not less than the 1983 level"--was still in effect under the partial year Continuing Appropriations Resolution.[Footnote 18] We concluded that the Continuing Resolution carried forward this requirement, explaining that absent specific legislative language, a continuing resolution maintains the status quo regarding government funding and operations. Although the 6-day delivery proviso is an operational directive, not an appropriation, we saw no language in the Continuing Resolution to indicate that Congress did not expect it to continue to apply. The full-year 2013 Continuing Resolution that Congress then enacted on March 21, shortly after we issued our opinion, which provided funding through the end of fiscal year 2013, likewise has continued the effectiveness of the 6-day proviso. On April 10, 2013, the USPS Board of Governors announced that based on the language of the March 21, 2013, Continuing Resolution, it would delay implementation of USPS's proposed delivery schedule until legislation is passed that provides it with the authority "to implement a financially appropriate and responsible delivery schedule." By statute, the Board directs the exercise of the power of the Postal Service, directs and controls the Postal Service's expenditures, and reviews its policies and practices.[Footnote 19]Thus, the Board, which has the lead responsibility for taking actions within the scope of the Postal Service's existing statutory authority to maintain its financial solvency, has determined that full 6-day service will continue for the present time. Retail: In April 2012, we reported that USPS has taken several actions to restructure its retail network--which included almost 32,000 postal managed facilities in fiscal year 2012--through reducing its workforce and its footprint while expanding retail alternatives.[Footnote 20] We also reported on concerns customers and other stakeholders have expressed regarding the impact of post office closures on communities, the adequacy of retail alternatives, and access to postal services, among others. We discussed challenges USPS faces, such as legal restrictions and resistance from some Members of Congress and the public, that have limited USPS's ability to change its retail network by moving postal services to more nonpostal-operated locations (such as grocery stores), similar to what other nations have done.[Footnote 21] The report concluded that USPS cannot support its current level of services and operations from its current revenues. We noted that policy issues remain unresolved related to what level of retail services USPS should provide, how the cost of these services should be paid, and how USPS should optimize its retail network. In November 2011, we reported that USPS had expanded access to its services through alternatives to post offices in support of its goals to improve service and financial performance and recommended that USPS develop and implement a plan with a timeline to guide efforts to modernize USPS's retail network, and that addresses both traditional post offices and retail alternatives as well.[Footnote 22] We added that the plan should also include: (1) criteria for ensuring the retail network continues to provide adequate access for customers as it is restructured; (2) procedures for obtaining reliable retail revenue and cost data to measure progress and inform future decision making; and: (3) a method to assess whether USPS's communications strategy is effectively reaching customers, particularly those customers in areas where post offices may close. In November 2012, we reported that although contract postal units (CPUs)--independent businesses compensated by USPS to sell most of the same products and services as post offices at the same price--have declined in number, they have supplemented post offices by providing additional locations and hours of service.[Footnote 23] More than 60 percent of CPUs are in urban areas where they can provide customers nearby alternatives when they face long lines at post offices. In fiscal year 2011, after compensating CPUs, USPS retained 87 cents of every dollar of CPU revenue. We found that limited interest from potential partners, competing demands on USPS staff resources, and changes to USPS's retail network posed potential challenges to USPS's use of CPUs. Addressing USPS Benefit Liabilities: To assist Congress in addressing issues related to funding USPS's liabilities, we have also issued several reports that address USPS's liabilities, including its retiree health benefits, pension, and workers' compensation. Retiree Health Benefits: In December 2012, we reported that USPS's deteriorating financial outlook will make it difficult to continue the current schedule for prefunding postal retiree health benefits in the short term, and possibly to fully fund the remaining $48 billion unfunded liability over the remaining decades of the statutorily required actuarial funding schedule.[Footnote 24] However, we also reported that deferring funding could increase costs for future ratepayers and increase the possibility that USPS may not be able to pay for some or all of its liability. We stated that failure to prefund these benefits is a potential concern. Making affordable prefunding payments would protect the viability of USPS by not saddling it with bills later on, when employees are already retired and no longer helping it generate revenue; it can also make the promised benefits more secure. Thus, as we have previously reported, we continue to believe that it is important for USPS to prefund these benefits to the maximum extent that its finances permit. We also recognize that without congressional or further USPS actions to align revenue and costs, USPS will not have the finances needed to make annual payments and reduce its long term retiree health unfunded liability. No funding approach will be viable unless USPS can make the required payments. FERS Pension Benefits: We reported on options with regard to the FERS surplus, noting the degree of uncertainty inherent in this estimate and reporting on the implications of alternative approaches to accessing this surplus. [Footnote 25] The estimated FERS surplus decreased from 2011 to 2012, and at the end of fiscal year 2012, USPS had an estimated FERS surplus of $3.0 billion and an estimated CSRS deficit of $18.7 billion. [Footnote 26] Workers' Compensation Benefits: In 2012, we reported on workers' compensation benefits paid to both postal and nonpostal beneficiaries under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA).[Footnote 27] USPS has large FECA program costs. At the time of their injury, 43 percent of FECA beneficiaries in 2010 were employed by USPS. FECA provides benefits to federal workers who sustained injuries or illnesses while performing federal duties and benefits are not taxed or subject to age restrictions. Various proposals to modify FECA benefit levels have been advanced. At the request of Congress, we have provided information to assist them in making decisions about the FECA program. Concluding Observations: In summary, to improve its financial situation, USPS needs to reduce its expenses to close its gap between revenue and expenses, repay its outstanding debt, continue funding its retirement obligations, and increase capital for investment, such as replacing its aging vehicle fleet. In addition, as noted in prior reports, congressional action is needed to (1) modify USPS's retiree health benefit payments in a fiscally responsible manner; (2) facilitate USPS's ability to align costs with revenues based on changing workload and mail use; and (3) require that any binding arbitration resulting from collective bargaining takes USPS's financial condition into account. As we have continued to underscore, Congress and USPS need to reach agreement on a comprehensive package of actions to improve USPS's financial viability. In previous reports, we have provided strategies and options, to both reduce costs and enhance revenues, that Congress could consider to better align USPS costs with revenues and address constraints and legal restrictions that limit USPS's ability to reduce costs and improve efficiency; we have also reported on implications for addressing USPS's benefit liabilities. If Congress does not act soon, USPS could be forced to take more drastic actions that could have disruptive, negative effects on its employees, customers, and the availability of reliable and affordable postal services. Chairman Issa, Ranking Member Cummings, and Members of the Committee, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be pleased to answer any questions that you may have at this time. GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: For further information about this statement, please contact Lorelei St. James, Director, Physical Infrastructure, at (202) 512-2834 or stjamesl@gao.gov. Contact points for our Congressional Relations and Public Affairs offices may be found on the last page of this statement. In addition to the contact named above, Frank Todisco, Chief Actuary; Samer Abbas, Teresa Anderson, Barbara Bovbjerg, Kyle Browning, Colin Fallon, Imoni Hampton, Kenneth John, Hannah Laufe, Kim McGatlin, Amelia Shachoy, Andrew Sherrill, and Crystal Wesco made important contributions to this statement. [End of section] Footnotes: [1] 39 U.S.C. § 101(a). [2] The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) required USPS to make fixed annual payments (ranging from $5.4 billion to $5.8 billion per year from fiscal years 2007 through 2016) to begin prefunding the cost of future retiree health benefits accrued by current employees and retirees. Pub. L. No. 109-435, § 803, 120 Stat. 3198 (Dec. 20, 2006). [3] Pub. L. No. 111-68, § 164(a), 123 Stat. 2053 (Oct. 1, 2009). [4] Pub. L. No. 112-74, § 632, 125 Stat. 786, 928 (Dec. 23, 2011). [5] United States Postal Service, 2012 Report on Form 10-K (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 15, 2012) 10. [6] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Strategies and Options to Facilitate Progress toward Financial Viability, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-455] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 12, 2010). [7] The $5.6 billion is the amount originally due in fiscal year 2012, before the fiscal year 2011 required payment of $5.5 billion was deferred and added to fiscal year 2012. [8] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Overview of Initiatives to Increase Revenue and Introduce Nonpostal Services and Experimental Postal Products, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-216] (Washington, D.C.: Jan. 15, 2013). [9] Such services were grandfathered by the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) after enactment of PAEA. PAEA eliminated USPS's authority to offer nonpostal services unless such services were offered as of January 1, 2006, and expressly grandfathered by PRC. USPS may, however, offer new nonpostal services and products if they are related to the grandfathered nonpostal services. It may also offer experimental postal products that meet certain conditions. [10] Negotiated service agreements are customized postal rate contracts with individual companies that generally provide lower prices on specific mail products in exchange for meeting volume targets and mail preparation requirements. [11] GAO, United States Postal Service: Strategy Needed to Address Aging Delivery Fleet, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-386] (Washington, D.C.: May 5, 2011). [12] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Mail Processing Network Exceeds What Is Needed for Declining Mail Volume, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-470] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 12, 2012). [13] Under USPS's February proposal, post offices open on Saturdays would remain open. [14] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Ending Saturday Delivery Would Reduce Costs, but Comprehensive Restructuring Is Also Needed, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-270], (Washington, D.C.: March 29, 2011). [15] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-270]. [16] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-455]. [17] Pub. L. No. 112-74, 125 Stat. 786, 923 (Dec. 23, 2011). [18] As requested, we considered only whether, during the period of the partial-year Continuing Resolution, USPS continued to be bound by the 6-day provision in its 2012 Appropriations Act, whatever its scope. We did not consider whether the planned service changes USPS had announced would comply with that provision. [19] 39 U.S.C. §§ 202, 205. [20] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Challenges Related to Restructuring the Postal Service's Retail Network, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-433] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 17, 2012). [21] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Foreign Posts' Strategies Could Inform U.S. Postal Service's Efforts to Modernize, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-282] (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 16, 2011). [22] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Action Needed to Maximize Cost-Saving Potential of Alternatives to Post Offices, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-100] (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 17, 2011). [23] GAO, Contract Postal Units: Analysis of Location, Service, and Financial Characteristics, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-41] (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 14, 2012). [24] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Status, Financial Outlook, and Alternative Approaches to Fund Retiree Health Benefits, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-112] (Washington, D.C.: Dec. 4, 2012). [25] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Allocation of Responsibility for Pension Benefits between the Postal Service and the Federal Government, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-146] (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 13, 2011). [26] USPS is required by law to make certain payments to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund to fund its share of CSRS and FERS pension costs. The same federal fund finances both CSRS and FERS. [27] GAO, Federal Employees' Compensation Act: Analysis of Proposed Program Changes, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-108] (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 26, 2012), Federal Employees' Compensation Act: Analysis of Proposed Changes on USPS Beneficiaries, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-142R] (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 26, 2012), and Federal Employees' Compensation Act: Effects of Proposed Changes on Partial Disability Beneficiaries Depend on Employment After Injury, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-143R] (Washington, D.C.: Dec. 7, 2012). [End of section] GAO’s Mission: The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO’s commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is through GAO’s website [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each weekday afternoon, GAO posts on its website newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] and select “E-mail Updates.” Order by Phone: The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO’s website, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or TDD (202) 512-2537. Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card, MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional information. Connect with GAO: Connect with GAO on facebook, flickr, twitter, and YouTube. Subscribe to our RSS Feeds or E mail Updates. Listen to our Podcasts. Visit GAO on the web at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: Contact: Website: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]; E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov; Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470. Congressional Relations: Katherine Siggerud, Managing Director, siggerudk@gao.gov: (202) 512-4400: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7125: Washington, DC 20548. Public Affairs: Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: (202) 512-4800: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7149: Washington, DC 20548. [End of document]