This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-01-134R 
entitled 'GAO Bid Protest Annual Report to the Congress for Fiscal 
Year 2000' which was released on December 21, 2000.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, 
as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' 
accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural 
and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility 
features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered 
footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency 
comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the 
presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document 
format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed 
version. 

We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the 
contents or accessibility features of this document to 
webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States General Accounting Office: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

GAO-02-134R: 

B-158766: 

December 21, 2000: 

The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert: 
Speaker of the House of Representatives: 

Dear Mr. Speaker: 

This letter responds to the requirements of the Competition in 
Contracting Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C.  3554(e) (Supp. IV 1998), that the 
Comptroller General report to the Congress each instance in which a 
federal agency did not fully implement a recommendation made by our 
Office in connection with a bid protest decided the prior fiscal year. 
We are pleased to report no such occurrence during fiscal year 2000. 

During the fiscal year, we received 1,152 protests (including 44 cost 
claims) and 68 requests for reconsideration, for a total of 1,220 
cases. We closed 1,275 cases: 1,204 protests (including 41 cost 
claims) and 71 requests for reconsideration. Enclosed for your 
information are some statistics concerning suspensions of contract 
awards and performance as a result of bid protests. 

A copy of this report, with the enclosure, is being furnished to the 
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the House Committee on 
Government Reform. A similar report is being furnished to the 
President of the Senate. 

Sincerely yours, 

Signed by: 

Anthony H. Gamboa: 
Acting General Counsel: 

Enclosure: 

Suspension of Award/Performance Data: 

Background: 

CICA contains several provisions whose purpose is to enhance the 
likelihood that protests can be decided before contract performance 
reaches a stage at which corrective action is effectively precluded. 
Where an agency is notified of a protest before award, CICA precludes 
an award unless the head of the procuring activity makes certain 
findings justifying the award. In cases where notice is received 
within 10 days following the date of award or within 5 days after a 
required debriefing, CICA requires the suspension of performance 
unless the head of the procuring activity makes certain other findings 
justifying the continuance of performance despite the protest. 

Data: 

The following tables present data regarding the number of contracts 
awarded after a protest was filed (table A), the number of protests in 
table A in which GAO sustained the protest (table B), the number of 
contracts in which performance was not suspended following a protest 
(table C), and the number of cases sustained by GAO in which 
performance was not suspended (table D). 

Table A: Protests Filed Before Award- Contracts Awarded After Protest 
Filing: 

Defense Agencies: 5; 
Civilian Agencies: 11. 

[End of table] 

Table B: Protests Filed Before Award- Protests Sustained Where 
Contracts Awarded After Protest Filing: 

Defense Agencies: 0; 
Civilian Agencies: 2. 

[End of table] 

Table C: Protests Filed After Award- Contracts in Which Performance 
Was Continued: 

Where agency determined that urgency justified continued performance: 
Defense Agencies: 20; 
Civilian Agencies: 24. 
	
Where agency found that continued performance was in Government's best 
interest: 
Defense Agencies: 31; 
Civilian Agencies: 33. 

[End of table] 
		
Table D: Protests Filed After Award- Protests Sustained Where 
Performance Was Continued: 

Where agency determined that urgency justified continued performance: 	
Defense Agencies: 0; 
Civilian Agencies: 0. 
	
Where agency found that	continued performance was in Government's best 
interest: 
Defense Agencies: 11; 
Civilian Agencies: 5. 

[End of table] 

[End of enclosure] 

[End of report]